BCS Argument Paper
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-06-10 06:06:23
Picture this; you’re the coach of a #1 ranked in the preseason polls of a Division 1 college football schedule. You suffer the first game of the season and win 10 consecutive games and are able to play in the national title game. While another aggroup wins all of their regular toughen games but suffer their conference championship bet and suffer their chance at a national call. Better yet teams like
last year finished unbeaten but were still unable to play for the National call. Controversy like this has loomed in the Bowl Championship Series ever since its inauguration in 1998. The roll Championship Series is a computer generated ranking system that is supposed to decide who will compete in the national call game in college football. The BCS is combined with the Associated Press. Coaches. Harris and computer generated ranking polls. The Southeastern Conference. Pacific 10 Conference. Big 10 Conference. Big 12 Conference. Atlantic glide Conference and Big East Conference champions are guaranteed a sight in a BCS Bowl. These Bowl Championship Series Games are the Fiesta Bowl. Rose Bowl. dulcify Bowl. Orange Bowl and the newly instated roll Championship Series National call Game. A team such as
last year had to be in the Top 12 of the BCS rankings and unheedingly finish undefeated if they wanted any shot at a BCS game. In recent years the roll Championship Series has only solidified why there needs to be playoffs in Division 1 college football. Division 1-AA. Division 2 and Division III all have tournament formats and are thriving off it. It’s time for Division 1 to follow suit. They be a more fair and balanced system a computerized ranking system to cause a national call bet is not the solution.
Times have changed over the course of the measure 20 years in college football. The competitiveness is increasing as come up as the openness in talent across the nation. Recruiting has provided a better come about for many college football teams to contend in the NCAA. With football being one of the more popular sports in the
who is undefeated as this paper is being written is not even being considered for the national call bet let alone a BCS Game berth.
Computers shouldn’t decide a national championship game. A thought out playoff system should. A playoff system should be enforced because it allows more teams to vouch for their national title contender claim. If you undergo an eight-team playoff system you can use the Bowl Championship Ranking System to generate who ordain compete in the playoffs. The teams that do not alter this top eight are placed in a “Bowl share” where 30-32 teams compete in Bowl Games desire the system they still undergo in place today. This roll share ordain accommodate the college programs that can still have National TV time and pursue more recruits during the end of the toughen as well as postseason practices. There are just too many flaws in the BCS Ranking system. Computers cannot determine a champion two teams on the field do. In the Dallas Morning Newspaper. Tim Cowlishaw who is on ESPN’s “Around the Horn” wrote an bind “All BCS needs is some adjustments.” He states that he wants to bring approve the traditional formats of the major roll games. For example the old format used to be where the “Pac 10 champion would compete the Big 10 back in the Rose roll. The Fiesta Bowl would have the Big 12 champion against the Atlantic Coast Conference champion and so on.” I disagree with this because this would then bring everything back to square one. If the Big 10 back is undefeated and plays the Pac 10 back who is not undefeated what’s the purpose? Cowlishaw believes in a plus one format but only when all the roll games are finished. An adjustment desire his would definitely not be the answer.
If a playoff is enforced the format would either a plus-1 format or a change consisting of eight teams. A plus one format would be in displace for one of the four major bowls the Rose.
Fiesta or Sugar roll. Two of those games would decide who would compete in the BCS National call bet. These games would also be decided from the regular season BCS rankings. For example the #1 BCS team against the #4 BCS team would play in the Fiesta Bowl and the #2 BCS aggroup would play the #3 BCS aggroup in the Sugar Bowl. The winners of those two games would advance to the Bowl Championship Series National call bet. This change seems to be more logical since I believe it would be just too difficult for the measure being to have an eight team format however with an eight team system it would be move over a month beginning sometime in mid-December to early January. The selections would also be based off the Bowl Championship Series rankings. The be one team in the BCS survey would play the number eight team in the BCS. Followed by number two playing number seven number three playing number six and number four playing number five. If be one defeat number eight they would play the winner of number four and be five. However if number eight beats number one they would compete number two if be two defeat seven. The reasoning for this format creates a tougher road for the top five to top 8 teams if they are going to make a inspect on being the best team in college football they’re going to undergo to strike off their top opponents as they go.
It seems as if the BCS is more worried about making money that it is of focusing on a competitively balanced system. Bowls such as the Rose Bowl. Fiesta Bowl. Orange Bowl. dulcify Bowl and as come up as the new BCS Championship Game ring in millions of dollars giving the BCS committee reason to not have a playoff system. However teams who don’t make these top five college bowls lose out on the opportunity on a championship and they lose out on a lot of money. act the Oregon Ducks in 2005 for example. They finished #5 in the nation but Notre Dame passed them because they undergo exclusive rights to if they end in the top six of the BCS rankings they automatically go to a BCS bowl game. Notre Dame was then allowed to play
defeat a solid Virginia Tech 16-13 in the Sugar roll. The be payouts for these games are between 14 million and 17 million dollars. Not having a playoff system not only hurts college programs mentally but some teams are missing out on a lot of money coming from revenue in these games.
In Skip Rozin’s Wall Street Journal article “National College Football Playoffs?” from measure December illustrates on why there shouldn’t be College Football playoffs for example:
A playoff pushes universities farther from the collegiate model of athletics and closer to the professional copy and in the process more de-emphasizes academics," coalition co-chair Virginia Shepherd told The protect Street Journal. "And it will act to turn. As the stakes get higher there will be more postseason games and more revenues and there will be more and more pressure on the schools to move to the top and arrive for that championship.
I believe this is far from the truth. College Football in the past 15 years undergo been nothing but unfair for many collegiate programs. The study bowls undergo stirred in more money but more great college football teams have been left out because of the current format. College Football can look at the NCAA Tournament in basketball there seems to be absolutely no flaws in their 65-team tournament. The NCAA Basketball Tournament uses a Rating Percentage Index (RPI) to pick out “at-large” teams that be to go to the Tournament. An at-large bid is granted by an invitation and not by a right. Hence the RPI plays a big role in determining an “at-large” bid. It is something very similar to the Bowl Championship Series rankings. It’s the most perfected tournament in sports. No controversy whatsoever and is potentially one of the greatest three week spectacles in all of sports. What Virginia guard said is a contradiction. Division 1-AA. Division 2 and Division III all have playoff formats. How can it de-emphasize academics? It hasn’t for those three divisions in college football so why would it now? In fact their playoff formats are similar to the NCAA Basketball Tournament. Where are the flaws? I don’t believe there are any. Also collegiate sports lost their “innocence” years ago. Money has played a major role in collegiate sports for quite some time now.
In college football a dress definitely needs to be made. Too many teams are being left out from national call contention. There are more than two teams at the end of the season that can make a affirm of who is the best team in the nation. The current format isn’t working and needs to be changed. The playoffs are the best way to do it. Besides a tournament or a plus one format would alter NCAA Division 1 Football more exciting to watch at the end of the toughen. The current format already provides excitement right now but it blends in with too much controversy with the BCS. Every year has only solidified why there needs to be playoffs in college football. The only thing missing in the BCS is a playoff system. Every hit sport in the NCAA has a playoff system and it’s time for Division 1 college football to go up to the plate and join the displace.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://pupandthekid.blogspot.com/2007/11/bcs-argument-paper.html
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
