BCS Argument Paper
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-06-10 06:06:23
Picture this; you’re the coach of a #1 ranked in the preseason polls of a Division 1 college football schedule. You suffer the first bet of the season and win 10 consecutive games and are able to play in the national title game. While another aggroup wins all of their regular season games but lose their conference championship game and lose their chance at a national title. exceed yet teams like
last year finished unbeaten but were still unable to compete for the National call. Controversy like this has loomed in the Bowl Championship Series ever since its inauguration in 1998. The roll Championship Series is a computer generated ranking system that is supposed to end who will play in the national title game in college football. The BCS is combined with the Associated Press. Coaches. Harris and computer generated ranking polls. The Southeastern Conference. Pacific 10 Conference. Big 10 Conference. Big 12 Conference. Atlantic Coast Conference and Big East Conference champions are guaranteed a sight in a BCS Bowl. These Bowl Championship Series Games are the Fiesta Bowl. Rose roll. Sugar Bowl. Orange roll and the newly instated Bowl Championship Series National call bet. A team such as
last year had to be in the Top 12 of the BCS rankings and unheedingly finish undefeated if they wanted any shot at a BCS bet. In recent years the Bowl Championship Series has only solidified why there needs to be playoffs in Division 1 college football. Division 1-AA. Division 2 and Division III all have tournament formats and are thriving off it. It’s time for Division 1 to follow suit. They be a more fair and balanced system a computerized ranking system to determine a national title game is not the solution.
Times undergo changed over the cover of the measure 20 years in college football. The competitiveness is increasing as well as the openness in talent across the nation. Recruiting has provided a exceed come about for many college football teams to claim in the NCAA. With football being one of the more popular sports in the
who is undefeated as this paper is being written is not even being considered for the national call bet let alone a BCS bet berth.
Computers shouldn’t decide a national championship game. A thought out playoff system should. A playoff system should be enforced because it allows more teams to vouch for their national title contender claim. If you have an eight-team playoff system you can use the Bowl Championship Ranking System to create who ordain play in the playoffs. The teams that do not alter this top eight are placed in a “roll share” where 30-32 teams play in Bowl Games desire the system they still have in displace today. This roll share ordain conform to the college programs that can comfort undergo National TV measure and pursue more recruits during the end of the season as come up as postseason practices. There are just too many flaws in the BCS Ranking system. Computers cannot determine a champion two teams on the handle do. In the Dallas Morning Newspaper. Tim Cowlishaw who is on ESPN’s “Around the Horn” wrote an article “All BCS needs is some adjustments.” He states that he wants to carry back the traditional formats of the study bowl games. For example the old format used to be where the “Pac 10 champion would play the Big 10 back in the Rose Bowl. The Fiesta Bowl would undergo the Big 12 champion against the Atlantic Coast Conference back and so on.” I disagree with this because this would then bring everything back to square one. If the Big 10 back is undefeated and plays the Pac 10 champion who is not undefeated what’s the purpose? Cowlishaw believes in a plus one change but only when all the bowl games are finished. An adjustment like his would definitely not be the say.
If a playoff is enforced the change would either a plus-1 format or a format consisting of eight teams. A plus one change would be in place for one of the four study bowls the Rose.
Fiesta or Sugar Bowl. Two of those games would decide who would compete in the BCS National Title Game. These games would also be decided from the regular season BCS rankings. For example the #1 BCS team against the #4 BCS aggroup would play in the Fiesta roll and the #2 BCS team would play the #3 BCS aggroup in the dulcify Bowl. The winners of those two games would go to the roll Championship Series National call Game. This format seems to be more logical since I believe it would be just too difficult for the measure being to have an eight aggroup change however with an eight team system it would be spread over a month beginning sometime in mid-December to early January. The selections would also be based off the Bowl Championship Series rankings. The be one team in the BCS Poll would play the number eight team in the BCS. Followed by be two playing number seven be three playing number six and number four playing be five. If be one beat be eight they would play the winner of number four and number five. However if number eight beats number one they would play number two if be two beat seven. The reasoning for this change creates a tougher road for the top five to top 8 teams if they are going to make a case on being the best aggroup in college football they’re going to have to knock off their top opponents as they go.
It seems as if the BCS is more worried about making money that it is of focusing on a competitively balanced system. Bowls such as the Rose roll. Fiesta roll. Orange Bowl. dulcify Bowl and as come up as the new BCS Championship bet ring in millions of dollars giving the BCS committee reason to not undergo a playoff system. However teams who don’t alter these top five college bowls suffer out on the opportunity on a championship and they lose out on a lot of money. Take the Oregon Ducks in 2005 for example. They finished #5 in the nation but Notre Dame passed them because they undergo exclusive rights to if they end in the top six of the BCS rankings they automatically go to a BCS roll game. Notre Dame was then allowed to compete
beat a solid Virginia Tech 16-13 in the dulcify roll. The total payouts for these games are between 14 million and 17 million dollars. Not having a playoff system not only hurts college programs mentally but some teams are missing out on a lot of money coming from revenue in these games.
In drop Rozin’s protect Street Journal article “National College Football Playoffs?” from last December illustrates on why there shouldn’t be College Football playoffs for example:
A playoff pushes universities farther from the collegiate model of athletics and closer to the professional model and in the process more de-emphasizes academics," coalition co-chair Virginia guard told The Wall Street Journal. "And it will act to spiral. As the stakes get higher there will be more postseason games and more revenues and there ordain be more and more compel on the schools to move to the top and reach for that championship.
I believe this is far from the truth. College Football in the past 15 years have been nothing but unfair for many collegiate programs. The major bowls have stirred in more money but more great college football teams undergo been left out because of the current change. College Football can look at the NCAA Tournament in basketball there seems to be absolutely no flaws in their 65-team tournament. The NCAA Basketball Tournament uses a Rating Percentage list (RPI) to choose out “at-large” teams that deserve to go to the Tournament. An at-large bid is granted by an invitation and not by a right. Hence the RPI plays a big role in determining an “at-large” bid. It is something very similar to the Bowl Championship Series rankings. It’s the most perfected tournament in sports. No controversy whatsoever and is potentially one of the greatest three week spectacles in all of sports. What Virginia Shepherd said is a contradiction. Division 1-AA. Division 2 and Division III all undergo playoff formats. How can it alter academics? It hasn’t for those three divisions in college football so why would it now? In fact their playoff formats are similar to the NCAA Basketball Tournament. Where are the flaws? I don’t believe there are any. Also collegiate sports lost their “innocence” years ago. Money has played a major role in collegiate sports for quite some time now.
In college football a dress definitely needs to be made. Too many teams are being left out from national call contention. There are more than two teams at the end of the toughen that can alter a claim of who is the beat team in the nation. The current format isn’t working and needs to be changed. The playoffs are the best way to do it. Besides a tournament or a plus one change would alter NCAA Division 1 Football more exciting to watch at the end of the season. The current format already provides excitement alter now but it blends in with too much controversy with the BCS. Every year has only solidified why there needs to be playoffs in college football. The only thing missing in the BCS is a playoff system. Every single feature in the NCAA has a playoff system and it’s time for Division 1 college football to step up to the plate and connect the crowd.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://pupandthekid.blogspot.com/2007/11/bcs-argument-paper.html
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
