So, which college football conference is best...in the books?
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-06-10 06:06:53
On occasion. I'll read some blogs or communicate boards to get some insight (I use that term lightly) and discuss sports with populate since many of my friends aren't really into the whole "being a fan" deal. One of the topics that keeps coming up (especially after this upset-filled year) is college football's (just talking FBS here) best conference. I've heard a million arguments; some good some downright stupid. Then. I thought:You can't compete football forever alter? And they're student-athletes alter? So which conference is best. in academics?I did a little math and got the GSR (Graduation Success Rate) of all the Division 1 (FBS) teams* then open the averages of the individual conferences. Here's the lowdown. According to the NCAA's press release the GSR measures the aggroup's percentage of players who-began college between 1997-2000 and-graduated in six yearsThis is the third year that they've used the GSR formula instead of the Federal Rate which counted transfers and players who left the team as non-graduates. This new formula makes it as if transfers and "droppers" never existed. Anyway:In descending request:ACC-73.16%MAC-68.23%Big Ten-66.45%Conference USA:65.33%Big East:64.38%Big XII:64.33%Mountain West:63.22%Sun Belt-62.71%**SEC-59.75%Pac 10-59.30%WAC-53.67Highest-Northwestern (Big 10. 94%)Lowest-San Jose St (Wac. 36%)*This doesn't including Navy. Army. Notre Dame or Western Kentucky as they're independents. To their credit. Navy. Army and ND undergo GSR's of over 90%.**This doesn't including FIU as their football schedule has only been around since 2002. Not sure if that helps or hurts their conference. It's settled. The ACC is the beat conference.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.yardbarker.com/author/article/39828
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
